Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesise evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of FE NO for asthma in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic searches (nine key biomedical databases and trial registers) were carried out to November 2014. Records were included if they: recruited patients with the symptoms of asthma; used a single set of inclusion criteria; measured FE NO50 in accordance with American Thoracic Society guidelines, 2005 (off-line excluded); reported/allowed calculation of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative patients as classified against any reference standard. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS II. Meta-analysis was planned where clinical study heterogeneity allowed. Rule-in and Rule-out uses of FE NO were considered. RESULTS: 4861 records were identified originally and 1312 in an update. 27 studies were included. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Results varied even within subgroups of studies. Cut-off values for the best sum of sensitivity and specificity varied from 12ppb to 55ppb, but did not produce high accuracy. 100% sensitivity or 100% specificity were reported by some studies indicating potential use as a rule-in or rule-out strategy. CONCLUSIONS: FE NO50 had variable diagnostic accuracy even within subgroups of studies with similar characteristics. Diagnostic accuracy, optimal cut-off values and best position for FE NO50 within a pathway remain poorly evidenced. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/cea.12867

Type

Journal article

Journal

Clin Exp Allergy

Publication Date

01/12/2016

Keywords

Asthma, Diagnosis, exhaled nitric oxide, meta analysis, systematic review