Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

IntroductionTrainees report inadequate exposure and training barriers in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed (AUGIB) endoscopic management. This UK-wide survey evaluated the experiences of trainees and trainers in AUGIB endoscopy training.MethodsA questionnaire was distributed to UK upper GI endoscopy trainees and trainers in 2022–2023.ResultsWe received responses from 137 trainees (23%) and 115 trainers (76%). Trainees reported higher exposure to diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs) than AUGIB endoscopy (median 300, IQR 203–441 vs 15, IQR 2.5–35.5 lifetime procedures), with variations among grades and regions. Among trainees, 55% were specialist trainee (ST)3–5 and 28% ST6–7; 73% had Joint Advisory Group (JAG) certification for OGDs, and 32% attended a JAG-approved haemostasis course. For ST6–7 trainees, the highest lifetime procedure counts were for band ligation (median 20, IQR 8.5–39) and injection therapy (median 10, IQR 6.5–29.5); the lowest counts were for glue, over-the-scope clip and Danis stent (median 0). ≤41% of ST6–7 trainees felt confident in independent haemostatic procedures. Most trainees (68%) and trainers (64%) reported difficulties in AUGIB endoscopy training. Key barriers included lack of structured training (94% trainees), not being part of the AUGIB on-call rota (78% trainees and 72% trainers) and intensive acute-take commitments (75% trainees and 85% trainers). Suggested improvements included mandatory AUGIB on-call rota participation (89% trainees and 85% trainers), access to JAG-approved haemostasis courses (85% trainees and 84% trainers), simulation-based training (83% trainees and 72% trainers) and reduced acute-take commitments (80% trainees and trainers).ConclusionThis survey highlights limited exposure to haemostasis procedures and low perceived competence among UK trainees. Addressing these challenges provides an opportunity for targeted improvements, ensuring a more comprehensive training experience.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/flgastro-2024-102818

Type

Journal

Frontline Gastroenterology

Publisher

BMJ

Publication Date

23/11/2024