Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Advances in both high-throughput sequencing and whole-genome amplification (WGA) protocols have allowed genomes to be sequenced from femtograms of DNA, for example from individual cells or from precious clinical and archived samples. Using the highly curated Caenorhabditis elegans genome as a reference, we have sequenced and identified errors and biases associated with Illumina library construction, library insert size, different WGA methods and genome features such as GC bias and simple repeat content. Detailed analysis of the reads from amplified libraries revealed characteristics suggesting that majority of amplified fragment ends are identical but inverted versions of each other. Read coverage in amplified libraries is correlated with both tandem and inverted repeat content, while GC content only influences sequencing in long-insert libraries. Nevertheless, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calls and assembly metrics from reads in amplified libraries show comparable results with unamplified libraries. To utilize the full potential of WGA to reveal the real biological interest, this article highlights the importance of recognizing additional sources of errors from amplified sequence reads and discusses the potential implications in downstream analyses.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1093/dnares/dst054

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2014-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

21

Pages

243 - 254

Total pages

11

Addresses

P, a, r, a, s, i, t, e, , G, e, n, o, m, i, c, s, ,, , W, e, l, l, c, o, m, e, , T, r, u, s, t, , S, a, n, g, e, r, , I, n, s, t, i, t, u, t, e, ,, , W, e, l, l, c, o, m, e, , T, r, u, s, t, , G, e, n, o, m, e, , C, a, m, p, u, s, ,, , C, a, m, b, r, i, d, g, e, , C, B, 1, 0, , 1, S, A, ,, , U, K, , F, a, c, u, l, t, y, , o, f, , M, e, d, i, c, i, n, e, ,, , D, i, v, i, s, i, o, n, , o, f, , P, a, r, a, s, i, t, o, l, o, g, y, ,, , D, e, p, a, r, t, m, e, n, t, , o, f, , I, n, f, e, c, t, i, o, u, s, , D, i, s, e, a, s, e, ,, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , M, i, y, a, z, a, k, i, ,, , M, i, y, a, z, a, k, i, , 8, 8, 9, -, 1, 6, 9, 2, ,, , J, a, p, a, n, .

Keywords

Animals, Caenorhabditis elegans, DNA, Helminth, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomic Library, Genome, Helminth, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing