Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A 60-year-old woman presented after a fall and was noted to have ascites. She had a history of ulcerative colitis. History and physical examination did not reveal the likely aetiology of the ascites, but a sample showed it to be a blood-stained exudate. A malignant cause appeared likely, cross-sectional imaging was arranged and tumour markers sent. CA125 was 34 IU/ml (0-30); α-fetoprotein (AFP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were normal. However, CA19-9 was 2880 U/ml (0-31). Pancreatic carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma were of prime concern, but a CT scan and MRI imaging were normal. At laparoscopy a benign ruptured ovarian cyst was detected, and ascites drained. CA19-9 returned to normal and the patient remains well 9 months later. This case demonstrates how tumour markers may be misleading in the context of diagnostics, and is the highest reported example of CA19-9 rise in the context of benign ascites and benign ovarian pathology.

Original publication




Journal article


BMJ Case Rep

Publication Date