Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundChanges from baseline in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (Eos) may be related to efficacy outcomes in dupilumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.ObjectiveThis post hoc analysis investigated biomarker changes in placebo- and dupilumab-treated patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma enrolled in QUEST (NCT02414854).MethodsSpline analyses of annualized severe exacerbation rate (AER) and change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 52 were performed as a function of the fold change in FeNO at week 52 and the maximum fold change in Eos over weeks 0-12 (also change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 at week 12).ResultsThe combined placebo and dupilumab groups comprised 638 and 1264 patients, respectively. FeNO levels declined rapidly by week 2 and then gradually to week 52 in patients treated with dupilumab versus placebo; Eos, after initially increasing with dupilumab, declined slightly from baseline in both treatment groups. AER during QUEST showed no significant association with the change in biomarkers in either treatment group. The change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 at week 52 was inversely associated with the fold change in FeNO in both groups, with a significant difference between the dupilumab and placebo curves (P = .014), and was positively associated with the fold change in Eos in both groups (P = .022).ConclusionsRelative changes in FeNO and Eos were not associated with AER, regardless of treatment arm. However, changes in both biomarkers showed a predictive value for lung function improvement; for FeNO, this was specific to the dupilumab treatment arm.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jaip.2024.03.031

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2024-07-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

12

Pages

1763 - 1772

Total pages

9

Addresses

N, I, H, R, , O, x, f, o, r, d, , B, i, o, m, e, d, i, c, a, l, , R, e, s, e, a, r, c, h, , C, e, n, t, r, e, ,, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , O, x, f, o, r, d, ,, , O, x, f, o, r, d, ,, , U, n, i, t, e, d, , K, i, n, g, d, o, m, ., , E, l, e, c, t, r, o, n, i, c, , a, d, d, r, e, s, s, :, , i, a, n, ., p, a, v, o, r, d, @, n, d, m, ., o, x, ., a, c, ., u, k, .

Keywords

Eosinophils, Humans, Asthma, Disease Progression, Nitric Oxide, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Forced Expiratory Volume, Leukocyte Count, Treatment Outcome, Severity of Illness Index, Double-Blind Method, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Biomarkers