Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Inhaled heparin inhibits the early response to allergen and exercise-induced asthma, probably by inhibiting mast cell mediator release. Recent animal studies suggest that heparin might also inhibit cholinergic neurotransmission in asthma by restoring inhibitory M2 receptor function. We have tested the hypothesis that heparin inhibits neurally-mediated bronchoconstriction in asthma by examining the effect of inhaled heparin on bronchial reactivity to sodium metabisulphite. We also examined the effect of inhaled heparin on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction to exclude a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. Eleven patients with mild asthma inhaled nebulized heparin (1,000 U.kg-1) or placebo (normal saline) in a randomized, double-blind fashion, 10 min before a challenge with sodium metabisulphite. Nine patients were also challenged with methacholine after the same dose of heparin or placebo. Inhaled heparin did not significantly change forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), nor did it alter the provocative dose of sodium metabisulphite or methacholine required to cause a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20). Geometric mean sodium metabisulphite PD20 was 2.54 and 2.15 mumol after placebo and heparin, respectively (mean difference -0.24 doubling doses; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.64-0.17). Geometric mean methacholine PD20 was 1.00 and 1.51 mumol after placebo and heparin, respectively (mean difference 0.6 doubling doses; 95% CI -0.25-1.5). Thus, heparin inhaled at doses sufficient to inhibit allergen and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction has no effect on the response to sodium metabisulphite and methacholine challenge in asthma. This argues against an inhibitory effect on neural pathways or airway smooth muscle.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur Respir J

Publication Date

02/1996

Volume

9

Pages

217 - 219

Keywords

Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Asthma, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Bronchoconstriction, Bronchoconstrictor Agents, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Forced Expiratory Volume, Heparin, Humans, Male, Methacholine Chloride, Muscle, Smooth, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Sulfites